ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025
Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, health indicators, and risk of cardiovascular diseases among patients with diabetes: a prospective cohort study.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clonal Hematopoiesis and Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review.Journal of diabetes · 2026Review
- Association Between Clonal Hematopoiesis and Cardiometabolic Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Clonal Haematopoiesis in Type 2 Diabetes: A Review of Mechanistic Links With Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease.Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential in Cardiovascular Disease: Gene-Specific Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential and Cardiometabolic Disease: Challenges, Controversies and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biological aging and incident cardiovascular diseases in individuals with diabetes: insights from a large prospective cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- Clonal Hematopoiesis of Intermediate Potential in Atrial Fibrillation: A Critical View of Current Knowledge as a Springboard for Future Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pseudohypoxia caused by germline genetic alterations in the VHL gene is associated with increased diabetes and cardiovascular risk: a UK biobank study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP) was associated with diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, the effect of CHIP on CVD have not been evaluated among patients with diabetes, and whether maintaining the healthy indictors could mitigate the adverse influence was also unclear.
methodsA total of 22,239 adults from the UK Biobank with diabetes and available whole-exome sequence data, and free of CVD were included. Multivariable-adjusted Cox regressions were used to explore the associations of any CHIP (variant allele fraction ≥ 2%), large CHIP (variant allele fraction ≥ 10%), and the top 10 commonly mutated driver genes for CHIP and with risk of CVD. The joint associations between health indicators (body mass index [BMI], HbA1c, blood pressure [BP], and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL]) and CHIP were further investigated.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 13.2 years, 5366 participants with diabetes developed CVD events. The hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) of any CHIP and large CHIP were (1.21, 1.08-1.36) and (1.25, 1.09-1.43) for incident CVD, respectively. Significant associations between any CHIP and coronary heart disease (HR, 95%CI: 1.18, 1.03-1.36) and heart failure (1.73, 1.46-2.06) were observed, but not for stroke (1.14, 0.89-1.48). Gene-specific analyses suggested that the greatest association were for SF3B1 (HR, 95%CI: 2.50, 1.25-5.01) and TET2 (HR, 95%CI: 1.36, 1.07-1.77) with risk of CVD. There was no significant interaction between the four health indicators and CHIP in relation to incident CVD. Compared to patients without CHIP, those with any CHIP and ideal health indicators still exhibited significantly or nonsignificantly higher HRs (BMI: 1.18, 0.82-1.68; HbA1c: 1.12, 0.96-1.30; BP: 1.24, 1.03-1.49; LDL: 1.29, 1.09-1.53). Similar results were demonstrated using large CHIP.
conclusionsCHIP is independently associated with an increased risk of CVD in patients with diabetes, regardless of health indicator levels. Diabetic patients with CHIP but ideal health indicators still exhibited higher CVD risk compared with diabetic patients without CHIP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.