ArticleESC heart failure2025
Prediction of 90 day mortality in elderly patients with acute HF from e-health records using artificial intelligence.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of 90 day mortality in elderly patients with acute HF from e-health records using artificial intelligence.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- ChatGPT in cardiovascular medicine: revolution, hype, or helper?Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Prediction models and risk scores in different types of heart failure: a review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsMortality risk after hospitalization for heart failure (HF) is high, especially in the first 90 days. This study aimed to construct a model automatically predicting 90 day post-discharge mortality using electronic health record (EHR) data 48 h after admission and artificial intelligence.
methodsAll HF-related admissions from 2015 to 2020 in a single hospital were included in the model training. Comprehensive EHR data were collected 48 h after admission. Natural language processing was applied to textual information. Deaths were identified from the French national database. After variable selection with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, a logistic regression model was trained. Model performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)] was tested in two independent cohorts of patients admitted to two hospitals between March and December 2021.
resultsThe derivation cohort included 2257 admissions (248 deaths after hospitalization). The evaluation cohorts included 348 and 388 admissions (34 and 38 deaths, respectively). Forty-two independent variables were selected. The model performed well in the derivation cohort [AUC: 0.817; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.789-0.845)] and in both evaluation cohorts [AUC: 0.750; 95% CI (0.672-0.829) and AUC: 0.723; 95% CI (0.644-0.803]), with better performance than previous models in the literature. Calibration was good: 'low-risk' (predicted mortality ≤8%), 'intermediate-risk' (8-12.5%) and 'high-risk' (>12.5%) patients had an observed 90 day mortality rate of 3.8%, 8.4% and 19.4%, respectively.
conclusionsThe study proposed a robust model for the automatic prediction of 90 day mortality risk 48 h after hospitalization for decompensated HF. This could be used to identify high-risk patients for intensification of therapeutic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.