Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39949849›Full record

ArticleDigital health

COVID-19 recognition from chest X-ray images by combining deep learning with transfer learning.

Chang-Jiang Zhang, Lu-Ting Ruan, Ling-Feng Ji, Li-Li Feng, Fu-Qin Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chang-Jiang ZhangTaizhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Lu-Ting RuanCollege of Physics and Electronic Information Engineering, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, China.
Ling-Feng JiSchool of Electronic & Information Engineering (School of Big Data Science), Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.
Li-Li FengTaizhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1104-890X
Fu-Qin TangTaizhou Central Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Taizhou University, Taizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0274-5774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Based on the current research status, this paper proposes a deep learning model named Covid-DenseNet for COVID-19 detection from CXR (computed tomography) images, aiming to build a model with smaller computational complexity, stronger generalization ability, and excellent performance on benchmark datasets and other datasets with different sample distribution features and sample sizes. Methods: The proposed model first extracts and obtains features of multiple scales from the input image through transfer learning, followed by assigning internal weights to the extracted features through the attention mechanism to enhance important features and suppress irrelevant features; finally, the model fuses these features of different scales through the multi-scale fusion architecture we designed to obtain richer semantic information and improve modeling efficiency. Results: We evaluated our model and compared it with advanced models on three publicly available chest radiology datasets of different types, one of which is the baseline dataset, on which we constructed the model Covid-DenseNet, and the recognition accuracy on this test set was 96.89%, respectively. With recognition accuracy of 98.02% and 96.21% on the other two publicly available datasets, our model performs better than other advanced models. In addition, the performance of the model was further evaluated on external test sets, trained on data sets with balanced sample distribution (experiment 1) and unbalanced sample distribution (experiment 2), identified on the same external test set, and compared with DenseNet121. The recognition accuracy of the model in experiment 1 and experiment 2 is 80% and 77.5% respectively, which is 3.33% and 4.17% higher than that of DenseNet121 on external test set. On this basis, we also changed the number of samples in experiment 1 and experiment 2, and compared the impact of the change in the number of training set samples on the recognition accuracy of the model on the external test set. The results showed that when the number of samples increased and the sample features became more abundant, the trained Covid-DenseNet performed better on the external test set and the model became more robust. Conclusion: Compared with other advanced models, our model has achieved better results on multiple datasets, and the recognition effect on external test sets is also quite good, with good generalization performance and robustness, and with the enrichment of sample features, the robustness of the model is further improved, and it has better clinical practice ability.

Indexed as

attentionchest X-ray imagesCOVID-19deep learningimage classification

Identifiers

PMID39949849
PMCPMC11822832

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.