ArticleMedicine and pharmacy reports2025
Real world outcomes with Ibrutinib monotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a single center experience.
Article in Medicine and pharmacy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The advent of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors brought about a paradigm shift in the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), by offering a well-tolerated chemotherapy-free approach. Here, we share the experience with ibrutinib of a major Romanian regional cancer center. Methods: We screened patients treated for CLL in our center over 6 years (2017-2022) and included those who were treated with ibrutinib either in the first line of therapy or in subsequent lines. Results: We enrolled 61 patients, 40 with treatment-naïve (TN) CLL and 21 with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, with a median age at treatment initiation of 65 years. Concerning the prognostic-predictive workup, IgHV mutational status was available for 78.7% of the patients, TP53 sequencing for 82%, assessment of 17p deletion for 82%, and CD38 marker analysis was performed for 70.5%. With a median follow-up period of 55 months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 90.2%, with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 33 months and a median overall survival (OS) that has not been reached. In our cohort, albeit non-significant statistically, patients with TP53 mutation had a shorter OS and those with mutated IgHV, a shorter PFS. Rai 3-4 and Binet C stages at diagnosis were associated with a shorter PFS, but not OS. In our cohort, the correlation between survival and high Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) index was not statistically significant. Ibrutinib was generally well tolerated in our cohort, as only 14.8% of our patients discontinued treatment due to adverse effects. Conclusion: Our study suggests that ibrutinib is a valid therapeutic option for TN or R/R CLL patients, with a high ORR and a good safety profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.