Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39950172›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Parsing the heterogeneity of depression: a data-driven subgroup derived from cognitive function.

Chenyang Xu, Yanbao Tao, Yunhan Lin, Jiahui Zhu, Zhuoran Li, Jiayi Li, Mingqia Wang, Tao Huang, Chuan Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chenyang XuPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Yanbao TaoThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical College, Xinxiang, Henan, China.
Yunhan LinPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Jiahui ZhuBeijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders and National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhuoran LiOntario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jiayi LiPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Mingqia WangPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Chuan ShiPeking University Sixth Hospital, Peking University Institute of Mental Health, NHC Key Laboratory of Mental Health (Peking University), National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Peking University Sixth Hospital), Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Increasing evidences suggests that depression is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome. Cognitive deficits in depression are associated with poor psychosocial functioning and worse response to conventional antidepressants. However, a consistent profile of neurocognitive abnormalities in depression remains unclear. Objective: We used data-driven parsing of cognitive performance to reveal subgroups present across depressed individuals and then investigate the change pattern of cognitive subgroups across the course in follow-up. Method: We assessed cognition in 163 patients with depression using The Chinese Brief Cognitive Test(C-BCT) and the scores were compared with those of 196 healthy controls (HCs). 58 patients were reassessed after 8 weeks. We used K-means cluster analysis to identify cognitive subgroups, and compared clinical variables among these subgroups. A linear mixed-effects model, incorporating time and group (with interaction term: time × group) as fixed effects, was used to assess cognitive changes over time. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify risk factors associated with these subgroups. Results: Two distinct neurocognitive subgroups were identified: (1) a cognitive-impaired subgroup with global impairment across all domains assessed by the C-BCT, and (2) a cognitive-preserved subgroup, exhibited intact cognitive function, with performance well within the healthy range. The cognitive-impaired subgroup presented with more severe baseline symptoms, including depressed mood, guilt, suicidality, and poorer work performance. Significant group × time interactions were observed in the Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A) and Continuous Performance Test (CPT), but not in Symbol Coding or Digit Span tests. Despite partial improvement in TMT-A and CPT tests, the cognitive-impaired subgroup's scores remained lower than those of the cognitive-preserved subgroup across all tests at the study endpoint. Multiple regression analysis indicated that longer illness duration, lower educational levels, and antipsychotic medication use may be risk factors for cognitive impairment. Conclusion: This study identifies distinguishable cognitive subgroups in acute depression, thereby confirming the presence of cognitive heterogeneity. The cognitive-impaired subgroup exhibits distinct symptoms and persistent cognitive deficits even after treatment. Screening for cognitive dysfunction may facilitate more targeted interventions. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.chictr.org, identifier ChiCTR2400092796.

Indexed as

cluster analysiscognitive subtypedepressionheterogeneitylongitudinal study

Identifiers

PMID39950172
PMCPMC11821656

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.