ArticleJournal of global health2025
Building an effective coverage cascade for antenatal care: linking of household survey and health facility assessment data in eight low- and middle-income countries.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Substantial gaps exist between pregnant women's contact with health facilities and the quality of care they receive (effective coverage) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). An effective coverage cascade is a useful analytical approach to uncover gaps due to poor facility service readiness and quality of care. We estimated readiness-adjusted antenatal care (ANC) coverage and built an effective coverage cascade in countries with available data. Methods: We used data from latest household and health facility surveys in eight countries accounting for 28 925 women and 8621 facilities. Service readiness was assessed based on the availability of core items needed to provide quality ANC. We linked the household surveys with health facility data by subnational region and facility type to estimate readiness-adjusted ANC coverage for at least one, four, and eight or more ANC contacts and ANC content. We built a four-step ANC effective coverage cascade and calculated loss of coverage in terms of ANC readiness coverage gaps and missed opportunities. Results: The majority of women sought ANC services in lower-level facilities, except in Bangladesh, Nepal and Senegal. While at least one antenatal care contact (ANC1+) service coverage was high, ranging from 89.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 87.2-90.9) in Haiti to 98.1% (95% CI = 97.5-98.6) in Malawi, readiness-adjusted ANC1+ coverage was lower, ranging from 64% (95% CI = 62.4-65.5) in Haiti to 76.2% (95% CI = 75.1-77.2) in Nepal. We obtained readiness gaps as high as 33.7 percentage points in Malawi and missed opportunities of 21 percentage points in Tanzania. Poor diagnostic capacity and insufficient trained human resources drove the low ANC facility readiness. We found large inequalities in readiness-adjusted ANC1+ by socioeconomic status favouring wealthier and urban resident women. Conclusions: The effective coverage cascade for ANC services helped uncover large readiness gaps, missed opportunities, and socioeconomic inequalities. Improvements in facilities' diagnostic capacity and availability of trained human resources will enhance their ability to provide high quality health services and ensure health gains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.