ArticleEndocrine connections2025
Effectiveness of internet-based management in newly diagnosed young adults with type 2 diabetes: a prospective comparative study.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital Management of Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: Empowerment, Challenges, and Future Outlook.Current diabetes reports · 2026Review
- Personalized Medicine Interventions for Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Application of smart healthcare in the continuum of care for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Management of Early-Onset Type 2 Diabetes in Adults: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is rising among young adults, posing challenges for long-term management after discharge. Methods: This prospective comparative study included 120 newly diagnosed young adults with T2DM admitted between January and December 2023. Participants were randomized into intervention or control groups (n = 60 each). All patients received standard diabetes education and short-term insulin pump intensive therapy during hospitalization. After discharge, the control group received traditional care, while the intervention group utilized an internet-based management system incorporating continuous glucose monitoring, personalized feedback and remote healthcare team consultations. Primary outcomes included HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and β-cell function (HOMA-β and fasting C-peptide). Secondary outcomes included lipid profiles, renal function (urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR)), blood pressure, quality of life (SF-36) and depression scores (PHQ-9). Results: At 12 months, the intervention group had significantly lower HbA1c (6.5 vs 7.2%, P < 0.001) and better improvements in FBG, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, fasting C-peptide, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.01). Improvements in UACR and blood pressure were minimal (P > 0.05). SF-36 and PHQ-9 scores improved more significantly in the intervention group (P < 0.01). Diabetes remission rates were higher in the intervention group (60 vs 37%, P = 0.028) and remained significant after adjusting for baseline variables (P = 0.015). Conclusion: The internet-based management system with personalized feedback significantly improved glycemic control and quality of life in young adults with T2DM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.