ReviewPharmacological reviews2025
Prospects for the convergence of polyphenols with pharmaceutical drugs in type 2 diabetes: Challenges, risks, and strategies.
Review in Pharmacological reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential Involvement of Redox and Inflammatory Signalling in the Antihyperglycemic and Antioxidant Effects of Harmaline in Male Mice With Type 2 Diabetes.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Article
- Identification of antidiabetic leads using in-silico screening, molecular dynamics simulation, and biological evaluation using cell viability, anti-adipogenesis, glucose uptake, and peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-γ in-vitro assay.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2026Article
- Interrelation of Natural Polyphenol and Fibrosis in Diabetic Nephropathy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Phytochemicals Characterization and Antidiabetic Efficacy ofIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPRArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a complex disease that can lead to a variety of life-threatening secondary health conditions. Current treatment strategies primarily revolve around tight glucose control, which is difficult to achieve and often turns out to be dangerous because of possible hypoglycemic events. Numerous long-term studies have demonstrated that complex pathways, including low-grade inflammation due to fluctuating glucose levels, are involved in the progression of the disease and the development of secondary health conditions. Growing clinical evidence supports the effectiveness of using multiple medications, possibly in combination with insulin, to effectively manage T2DM. Despite the huge, largely untapped potential therapeutic benefit of polyphenols, there remains a general skepticism of the practice. However, for any evidence-based clinical intervention, the balance of benefits and risks takes center stage and is governed by biopharmaceutics principles. In this article, we outline the current clinical perspectives on pharmaceutical drug combinations, rationale for early initiation of insulin, and advantages of novel dosage forms to meet the pathophysiological changes of T2DM, emphasizing the need for further clinical studies to substantiate these approaches. We also make the case for traditional medicines and their combinations with pharmaceutical drugs and outline the inherent challenges in doing so, while also providing recommendations for future research and clinical practice. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Type 2 diabetes is associated with life-threatening secondary health conditions that are often difficult to treat. This review provides an in-depth account of preventing/delaying secondary health conditions through combination therapies and emphasizes the role of effective delivery strategies in realizing the translation of such combinations. This review builds the case for the importance of polyphenols in diabetes, determines the reasons for skepticism, and discusses potential combinations with pharmaceutical drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.