ArticleScientific reports2025
Changes of metabolic syndrome status alter the risks of cardiovascular diseases, stroke and all cause mortality.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Visceral Adiposity Index and Metabolic Syndrome and Its Components: Evidence From the PERSIAN Guilan Cohort Study.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Article
- ADHD and metabolic syndrome: behavioral and weight-related pathways to cardiovascular risk.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026Article
- Impact of Specific Metabolic Syndrome Combinations on Model-Estimated 10-Year Cardiovascular Risk in a Taiwanese Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Events and Predictors in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study: A 20-Year Cohort Review .International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Associations of abdominal obesity and plasma fatty acids with microvascular diseases.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and metabolic syndrome: a large cross-section study with dose response analysis in a health screening population.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Associations of cardiometabolic burden with cardiovascular disease-death transitions in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a prospective cohort study using multistate analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
- Causal effect of coffee consumption on metabolic syndrome in Korean adults: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study.Nutrition research and practice · 2025Article
- The additive effect of cardiopulmonary fitness and triglyceride-glucose index on the risk of metabolic syndrome.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Research Progress on Chemical Components ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact of phytosterol supplementation on metabolic syndrome factors: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Polymorphisms of theJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The interplay between metabolic health factors and stroke incidence in aging populations.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research focused primarily on static metabolic syndrome (MetS) status, with less discussion on the effects of its dynamic changes on cardiovascular diseases (CVD), stroke, and all-cause mortality. This study examines the impact of MetS status changes on these health outcomes. This study used data from two prospective cohorts: the China Longitudinal Study of Health and Retirement (CHARLS) and the Wuhan Elderly Health Examination Center community (WEHECC). MetS was determined using the ATP III criteria. Participants were classified based on changes in MetS status, defined as MetS-free, MetS-recovery, MetS-developed, and MetS-chronic, assessed at baseline and at follow-up (three years later for CHARLS and six years later for WEHECC cohort). The primary outcomes for CHARLS included all-cause mortality, physician-diagnosed CVD, and stroke, while WEHECC cohort focused solely on all-cause mortality. Logistic regression models were utilized to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Over the follow-up period from 2015 to 2018 in CHARLS, 335 participants (7.1%) developed CVD, and 237 (5.1%) experienced a stroke. Relative to the MetS-free group, individuals with MetS-chronic displayed higher risks of CVD (OR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.25 to 2.13]) and stroke (OR, 2.95 [95% CI, 2.11 to 4.15]). In the WEHECC cohort, 40 participants died by 2022, with the MetS-chronic group showing a increased risk of all-cause mortality (OR, 2.76 [CI, 1.03 to 7.39]). Changes in MetS status are associated with different risks of CVD, stroke, and mortality, with chronic MetS significantly increasing these risks compared to MetS-free.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.