ArticleCancer medicine2025
Delivering Trio Germline Whole Genome Sequencing to Patients Newly Diagnosed With Childhood Cancer: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives of the PREDICT Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGermline genomic sequencing (GS) is increasingly offered to children with cancer. To optimize integration into routine care, assessment of implementation barriers and a better understanding of healthcare professionals' perspectives and experiences are needed.
methodsHealthcare professionals delivered trio germline GS to newly diagnosed pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer via the PREDICT completed questionnaires with qualitative and quantitative items. Each study site recorded reasons for eligible families' nonenrolment in PREDICT to identify barriers to recruitment. Quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive statistics, whereas qualitative data underwent inductive content analysis, with results integrated for interpretation.
resultsThirty-three healthcare professionals participated, including 23 oncology professionals and 10 genetic professionals. Healthcare professionals perceived PREDICT as beneficial to participating and future families, and that perceptions of personal benefit and altruism were drivers of family uptake. Concerns included workforce capacity and potential family distress given the trio design and high-stress diagnosis setting. Barriers to recruitment related to clinical decision-making, family factors, and logistics. Although most rated their genetics/genomics knowledge as "good," regarding germline results, few were "very confident" interpreting (29%), explaining (32%), making treatment recommendations (9.7%), and providing psychosocial support to families (29%). They acknowledged a need for further training in these areas for trainees; yet, fewer were interested in training for themselves.
conclusionSuccessful implementation of routine germline GS will require targeted strategies to address logistical issues and alleviate potential negative psychosocial impacts for families. Recognizing the escalating demand on genetics experts, upskilling of the current workforce and involvement of a broader spectrum of healthcare professionals are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.