Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39953887›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2025

Mapping commercial practices of the pesticide industry to shape science and policymaking: a scoping review.

Lisa Schölin, Mark Petticrew, Jeff Collin, Duleeka Knipe, Rachel Barry, Michael Eddleston, David Gunnell, Melissa Pearson, May C I van Schalkwyk

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Underinvestment, Corporate Power and Health Promotion's Moral Jeopardy.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa SchölinCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention and Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, EH16 4TJ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1348-672X
Mark PetticrewDepartment of Public Health, Environments, and Society, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, London, United Kingdom.
Jeff CollinShaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm, SPECTRUM Consortium, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, EH8 9AG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Duleeka KnipePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, BS8 1QU, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Rachel BarryShaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm, SPECTRUM Consortium, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, EH8 9AG, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1683-7895
Michael EddlestonCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention and Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, EH16 4TJ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David GunnellPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Beacon House, Queens Road, BS8 1QU, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Melissa PearsonCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention and Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, 47 Little France Crescent, EH16 4TJ, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
May C I van SchalkwykDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, WC1E 7HT, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2210-2289

Funding

AFSPAmerican Foundation for Suicide PreventionBritish Heart FoundationCancer Research UKCarnegie TrustCentre for Pesticide Suicide PreventionCPSPEconomic and Social Research CouncilEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilHCRW_Institute for Alcohol StudiesMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health ResearchNational Institute for Health Research NIHR3000156National Institute of Health ResearchNatural Environment Research CouncilNIHR Applied Research Collaboration North ThamesOpen PhilanthropyPublic Health AgencyScottish Government Chief Scientist OfficeUK fundersUK Prevention Research PartnershipWellcome and The Health FoundationWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing body of evidence for how health harming industries (HHIs) engage in similar practices to influence science and policymaking. However, limited attention has been paid to the pesticide industry within the commercial determinants of health (CDOH) field. We conducted a scoping review to map practices adopted by the pesticide industry to influence science and policymaking and to assess the breadth and focus of the associated literature. We included 31 documents and categorized the extracted data using a typology of commercial practices. The documents described how major pesticide companies, and their trade bodies, have acted to influence science and maintain favourable regulatory environments while undermining the credibility of researchers and agencies that publish findings threatening to their commercial interests. A large proportion of the literature consists of historical analyses, narrative reviews, commentaries/perspective pieces, and investigative reports published in the grey literature, predominantly informed by analysis of internal industry documents and freedom of information requests. Most studies focus on high-income settings. There were a limited number of primary peer-reviewed empirical studies that explicitly aimed to study the practices of the pesticide industry from a CDOH perspective. However, our findings show that major pesticide companies adopt political and scientific practices highly similar to other HHIs. The review shows a critical need for research on the pesticide industry's current practices in low- and middle-income countries where the negative impacts of its activities on health and the environment are likely to be more marked.

Indexed as

CommercePesticidesPolicy MakingHumansPesticidescommercial determinants of healthcommercial practicesconflicts of interestpesticide industrypesticidespublic health policy

Identifiers

PMID39953887
PMCPMC11829166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.