ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2025
Improving genomic selection in hexaploid wheat with sub-genome additive and epistatic models.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficiency under epistasis of haplotype-based genomic selection for pure line breeding.Heredity · 2026Article
- The hidden geometry of breeding constraints.Nature plants · 2026Review
- Using genomic selection to examine subgenome dominance and epistasis in allopolyploid strawberry.The plant genome · 2026Article
- The next frontier for genomic prediction is computational.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Optimizing progeny size and number of crosses under genomic selection: insights into additive and epistatic contributions to long-term genetic gain.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Interchromosomal linkage disequilibrium analysis reveals strong indications of sign epistasis in wheat breeding families.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- WheatGP, a genomic prediction method based on CNN and LSTM.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of wheat breeding is the development of superior cultivars tailored to specific environments, and the identification of promising crosses is crucial for the success of breeding programs. Although genomic estimated breeding values were developed to estimate additive effects of genotypes before testing as parents, application has focused on predicting performance of candidate lines, ignoring nonadditive genetic effects. However, nonadditive genetic effects are hypothesized to be especially important in allopolyploid species due to the interaction between homeologous genes. The objectives of this study were to model additive and additive-by-additive epistatic effects to better delineate the genetic architecture of grain yield in wheat and to improve the accuracy of genome-wide predictions. The data set utilized consisted of 3,740 F5:6 experimental lines tested in the K-State wheat breeding program across the years 2016 and 2018. Covariance matrices were calculated based on whole- and sub-genome marker data, and the natural and orthogonal interaction approach was used to estimate variance components for additive and additive-by-additive epistatic effects. Incorporating epistatic effects in additive models resulted in nonorthogonal partitioning of genetic effects but increased total genetic variance and reduced deviance information criteria. Estimation of sub-genome effects indicated that genotypes with the greatest whole-genome effects often combine sub-genomes with intermediate to high effects, suggesting potential for crossing parental lines that have complementary sub-genome effects. Modeling epistasis in either whole-genome or sub-genome models led to a marginal (3%) improvement in genomic prediction accuracy, which could result in significant genetic gains across multiple cycles of breeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.