ArticleActa diabetologica2025
Different formulations of semaglutide and oxidative stress in subjects with type 2 diabetes and MASLD: an open-label, real-life study.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimSemaglutide exerts metabolic effects and cardiovascular protection in type 2 diabetes (T2D), also acting on hepatic steatosis and inflammation. No data are, so far, available on the effect of semaglutide on oxidative stress, neither a comparison of injective (InjS) and oral (OrS) formulations has been performed in subjects with T2D and liver steatosis.
methodsIn a real-life, open label, prospective study we compared standard doses of InjS and OrS in targeting liver inflammation and fibrosis and systemic markers of inflammation and oxidative stress by consecutively prescribing InjS or OrS formulation in a 2:1 ratio to sixty T2D + MASLD subjects (T0), observing them for 6 months (T1). Anthropometry, biochemistry and transient elastography (TE) data were collected; hormones, inflammatory cytokines and peroxidation products were measured.
resultsAt baseline, InjS and OrS subjects were similar, except for waist circumference, liver enzymes and Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP), a measure of liver steatosis (InjS > OrS, all p < 0.05). Differences emerged in T0-T1 variation between the formulations in HbA1c, lipid profile, blood pressure. CAP significantly decreased only in InjS. GLP-1 quite similarly increased; insulin, glucagon and GIP did not vary. InjS and OrS did not modify TNFα, IL-10 (an anti-inflammatory cytokine) and MCP-1, while IL-18 was reduced only by InjS. When exploring oxidative stress, AGEs were unaffected, Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances decreased in InjS, 4-Hydroxynonenal was reduced in OrS.
conclusionIn T2D + MASLD subjects, InjS, better than OrS, improves metabolic control; a significant reduction of IL-18 by InjS, and a mild anti-oxidative effect of both formulations are reported for the first time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39954057What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.