Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39955230›Full record

GuidelineBritish journal of anaesthesia2025

2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.

Alexander Wahba, Gudrun Kunst, Filip De Somer, Henrik Agerup Kildahl, Benjamin Milne, Gunilla Kjellberg, Adrian Bauer, Friedhelm Beyersdorf, Hanne Berg Ravn, Gerdy Debeuckelaere and 12 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. The protamine-to-heparin ratio: concept and clinical application.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Alexander WahbaDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway. Electronic address: alexander.wahba@ntnu.no.
Gudrun KunstDepartment of Anaesthetics and Pain Therapy King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, King's College London British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: gudrun.kunst@kcl.ac.uk.
Filip De SomerHeart Centre University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: chairman@ebcp.eu.
Henrik Agerup KildahlDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Benjamin MilneDepartment of Anaesthesia, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Gunilla KjellbergDepartment of Thoracic Surgery and Anaesthesiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Adrian BauerDepartment of Perfusiology, Evangelic Heart Center, Coswig, Germany.
Friedhelm BeyersdorfDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany; Medical Faculty of the Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Germany.
Hanne Berg RavnDepartment of Anaesthesia, Odense University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Southern Denmark University, Denmark.
Gerdy DebeuckelaerePerfusion Department, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Gabor ErdoesUniversity Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Renard Gerhardus HaumannDepartment of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Thoraxcentrum Twente, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands; Department of Biomechanical Engineering, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Tomas GudbjartssonDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Landspitali University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Frank MerkleFoundation Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Davide PaciniDivision of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Gianluca PaternosterCardiovascular Anesthesia and Intensive Care San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy; Department of Health Science Anesthesia and ICU School of Medicine, University of Basilicata San Carlo Hospital, Potenza, Italy.
Francesco OnoratiDivision of Cardiac Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy.
Marco RanucciDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and ICU, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy.
Nemanja RisticDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia.
Marc VivesDepartment of Anesthesia & Critical Care, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, Spain.
Milan MilojevicDepartment of Cardiac Surgery and Cardiovascular Research, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia.
EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Scientific Document Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guidelines consolidate and evaluate all pertinent evidence on a specific topic available at the time of their formulation. The goal is to assist physicians in determining the most effective management strategies for patients with a particular condition. These guidelines assess the impact on patient outcomes and weigh the risk-benefit ratio of various diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. While not a replacement for textbooks, they provide supplementary information on topics relevant to current clinical practice and become an essential tool to support the decisions made by specialists in daily practice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to understand that these recommendations are intended to guide, not dictate, clinical practice, and should be adapted to each patient's unique needs. Clinical situations vary, presenting a diverse array of variables and circumstances. Thus, the guidelines are meant to inform, not replace, the clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, grounded in their professional knowledge, experience and comprehension of each patient's specific context. Moreover, these guidelines are not considered legally binding; the legal duties of healthcare professionals are defined by prevailing laws and regulations, and adherence to these guidelines does not modify such responsibilities. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) constituted a task force of professionals specializing in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. To ensure transparency and integrity, all task force members involved in the development and review of these guidelines submitted conflict of interest declarations, which were compiled into a single document available on the EACTS website (https://www.eacts.org/resources/clinical-guidelines). Any alterations to these declarations during the development process were promptly reported to the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP. Funding for this task force was provided exclusively by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, without involvement from the healthcare industry or other entities. Following this collaborative endeavour, the governing bodies of EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP oversaw the formulation, refinement, and endorsement of these extensively revised guidelines. An external panel of experts thoroughly reviewed the initial draft, and their input guided subsequent amendments. After this detailed revision process, the final document was ratified by all task force experts and the leadership of the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, enabling its publication in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Endorsed by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, these guidelines represent the official standpoint on this subject. They demonstrate a dedication to continual enhancement, with routine updates planned to ensure that the guidelines remain current and valuable in the ever-progressing arena of clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyCardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiopulmonary BypassAdultEuropeHumansSocieties, Medicalcardiac anaesthesiacardiac surgerycardiopulmonary bypassclinical perfusionistEACTAICEACTSEBCPevidence-based practiceextracorporeal circulationguidelinesminimally invasive extracorporeal circulationrecommendations

Identifiers

PMID39955230
PMCPMC11947607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.