GuidelineBritish journal of anaesthesia2025
2024 EACTS/EACTAIC/EBCP Guidelines on cardiopulmonary bypass in adult cardiac surgery.
Guideline in British journal of anaesthesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology Standards and Guidelines for Pediatric and Congenital Perfusion Practice: 2025 Update☆.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2026Guideline
- The organ-protective effects of nitric oxide in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Pooled it
- Pulmonary artery catheters or central venous catheters for cardiac surgery: the PUMA Pilot randomised clinical trial.Anaesthesia · 2026Trial
- Preemptive noradrenaline infusion: a game-changer against post-induction hypotension in surgical sepsis: a randomized double blind trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Risk Factors for Myocardial Injury During Cardio-Pulmonary Bypass-Assisted Heart Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- The protamine-to-heparin ratio: concept and clinical application.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2026Article
- Update on Perioperative Prevention of Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Impact of oxygen delivery-guided perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass on 1-year renal outcomes.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Comparison of aprotinin and tranexamic acid in the prevention of perioperative bleeding in non-elective cardiac procedures involving the ascending aorta.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Cerebral protection strategies in aortic arch surgery: a review of techniques and outcomes.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Amino acids for the prevention of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a narrative review of trials and meta-analyses.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Review
- Serotonin Signaling and Vascular Reactivity in Cardiometabolic Disease and Cardiac Surgery.Cells · 2026Review
- Harbinger of Difficult Weaning from Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Case Report.Annals of cardiac anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Multicenter external validation of the FW-TRIC score for predicting red blood cell transfusion in on-pump cardiac surgery.Perioperative medicine (London, England) · 2026Article
- Cardiopulmonary Bypass Flow Rate and the Kidney: Reply.Anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Patient-centered outcomes according to cancer status in cardiac surgery patients: a population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2026Observational
- Article
- Article
- Effects of perioperative dexmedetomidine on renal vascular function and renovascular histopathology in ovine cardiopulmonary bypass.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: From Pathophysiology to Surgical Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical practice guidelines consolidate and evaluate all pertinent evidence on a specific topic available at the time of their formulation. The goal is to assist physicians in determining the most effective management strategies for patients with a particular condition. These guidelines assess the impact on patient outcomes and weigh the risk-benefit ratio of various diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. While not a replacement for textbooks, they provide supplementary information on topics relevant to current clinical practice and become an essential tool to support the decisions made by specialists in daily practice. Nonetheless, it is crucial to understand that these recommendations are intended to guide, not dictate, clinical practice, and should be adapted to each patient's unique needs. Clinical situations vary, presenting a diverse array of variables and circumstances. Thus, the guidelines are meant to inform, not replace, the clinical judgement of healthcare professionals, grounded in their professional knowledge, experience and comprehension of each patient's specific context. Moreover, these guidelines are not considered legally binding; the legal duties of healthcare professionals are defined by prevailing laws and regulations, and adherence to these guidelines does not modify such responsibilities. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC) and the European Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (EBCP) constituted a task force of professionals specializing in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) management. To ensure transparency and integrity, all task force members involved in the development and review of these guidelines submitted conflict of interest declarations, which were compiled into a single document available on the EACTS website (https://www.eacts.org/resources/clinical-guidelines). Any alterations to these declarations during the development process were promptly reported to the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP. Funding for this task force was provided exclusively by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, without involvement from the healthcare industry or other entities. Following this collaborative endeavour, the governing bodies of EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP oversaw the formulation, refinement, and endorsement of these extensively revised guidelines. An external panel of experts thoroughly reviewed the initial draft, and their input guided subsequent amendments. After this detailed revision process, the final document was ratified by all task force experts and the leadership of the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, enabling its publication in the European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, the British Journal of Anaesthesia and Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. Endorsed by the EACTS, EACTAIC and EBCP, these guidelines represent the official standpoint on this subject. They demonstrate a dedication to continual enhancement, with routine updates planned to ensure that the guidelines remain current and valuable in the ever-progressing arena of clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.