Observational studySleep2025
Sleep timing, sleep timing regularity, and cognitive performance in women entering late adulthood: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).
Observational study in Sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dose-Response Relationship Between Sleep Regularity Index and Stage-Specific Alzheimer's Disease: Cross-Sectional Evidence from Japanese Adults.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Tracking Cognitive Health With Wearables in Telerehabilitation Female Participants: Could Nighttime Sleep Measures Be Used as Sex-Specific Digital Endpoints?JMIR neurotechnology · 2026Article
- From yawn to dawn: the effects of a sleep extension intervention on objective and subjective dimensions of sleep health in adults with habitual short sleep duration.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026Article
- Sleep Abnormalities and Risk of Alzheimer's Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Actigraphy-derived time in bed: it's time to put this issue to bed.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
STUDY
objectivesThis study examined whether sleep timing and its regularity are associated with cognitive performance in older women and whether associations vary based on cardiometabolic risk factors.
methodsThe cross-sectional analysis included 1177 community-dwelling females (mean age 65 years) from the observational Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN) annual visit 15. Sleep timing (mean midpoint from sleep onset to wake-up) and its regularity (standard deviation of midpoint) were assessed using actigraphy. Cognitive measures included immediate and delayed verbal memory, working memory, and processing speed. Cardiometabolic risk measures included central obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD) risk score. Linear regression models, adjusted for covariates, tested associations between sleep and cognitive measures.
resultsAfter covariate adjustment, early sleep timing was associated with worse delayed verbal memory (β = -0.37; p = .047) and late sleep timing was associated with worse processing speed (β = -1.80; p = .008). Irregular sleep timing was associated with worse immediate (β = -0.29; p = .020) and delayed verbal memory (β = -0.36; p = .006), and better working memory (β = 0.50; p = .004). Associations between early sleep timing and delayed verbal memory strengthened as ASCVD risk increased (interaction β = -8.83, p = .026), and sleep timing irregularity's effect on working memory was stronger among women with hypertension (interaction β = -3.35, p = .039).
conclusionsSleep timing and its regularity are concurrently associated with cognitive performance in older women. Cardiovascular disease risk may modify some of these associations. Future longitudinal studies are needed to clarify these relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.