ArticleScientific reports2025
Disproportionality analysis of Raynaud's phenomenon associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors using the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Post-marketing safety of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants: A systematic review of spontaneous reporting system data.Headache · 2026Pooled it
- A phase 4, 24-week, open-label study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of once-daily dosing of 75 mg rimegepant for episodic migraine prevention.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Trial
- Reporting patterns of adverse drug withdrawal events using individual case safety reports in the FAERS and Eudravigilance databases.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Influence of comorbidities and patient demographics on Raynaud's symptom characteristics: implications for diagnosis and management.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2026Article
- A comprehensive study on drug-related Raynaud's phenomenon based on the FDA adverse event reporting system.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Expert consensus on gepants for acute and preventive treatment of migraine in Thailand.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Raynaud's phenomenon is a vascular condition characterized by episodic vasoconstriction, and recent reports suggest a potential link between calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors, used for migraine treatment, and the onset of this condition. This study evaluated the association between CGRP inhibitors and Raynaud's phenomenon using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). A retrospective analysis of adverse events from the approval year of each drug through August 2023 was conducted. Disproportionality was assessed using Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) and Information Components (IC), with significant signals of disproportionate reporting (SDR) identified by a lower 95% confidence interval (CI) for ROR > 1.0 and IC > 0. Intra-class and inter-class analyses were conducted to compare SDRs among CGRP inhibitors and other migraine therapies, including triptans, beta-blockers, and anticonvulsants. CGRP inhibitors demonstrated significant SDRs for Raynaud's phenomenon (ROR 19.12; 95% CI 15.44-23.69), with rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant showing particularly strong signals. Intra-class analysis revealed a significant SDR only for galcanezumab (ROR 2.01; 95% CI 1.28-3.17). Inter-class analysis indicated significant SDRs for CGRP inhibitors compared to beta-blockers, anticonvulsants, and celecoxib, but not triptans. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing pharmacovigilance and further research to validate these associations and ensure patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.