ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with coronary artery disease requiring cardiac surgery at a German university hospital.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies show conflicting results regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease requiring cardiac surgery and data from Germany are lacking. In this study, two patient cohorts who underwent coronary artery bypass graft surgery before and after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic were compared.
methodsPatients who presented for coronary artery bypass graft surgery before (01.05.18-30.04.19; group "B") or during the COVID-19 pandemic (01.05.20-30.04.21; group "P") at the University Hospital Münster in Germany were retrospectively identified and compared regarding demographics, preoperative status, surgical data, and postoperative outcome.
results513 (group "B") and 501 patients (group "P") were included, demographics were comparable. In group "P", preoperative myocardial infarction and emergency indications were more frequent, heart-lung machine and aortic clamping times were longer. Postoperative ICU-days and inpatient stay did not differ. Postoperative need of an extracorporeal life support system and intrahospital mortality tended to be higher in group "P", without reaching statistical significance.
conclusionThe COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on cardiac surgical care with the prioritization of emergency procedures. Patients treated during the pandemic were in a more critical preoperative condition, duration of surgery was longer, but post-operative mortality was comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.