ReviewOncogenesis2025
Proteomic meta-analysis unveils new frontiers for biomarkers research in pancreatic carcinoma.
Review in Oncogenesis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- miR-27b-5p targets RAB27A to regulate exosome secretion and migration of pancreatic cancer cells.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Peptides as integrative modulators for clinical prognosis and targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Automatic Blood Protein Enrichment by Magnetic-COF Polymers.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Discovery of a Secretory Granule Lumen-Enriched Serum Protein Signature in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Digital immune twins and ai-integrated multi-omic biomarkers: Redefining personalized immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pancreatic carcinoma (PC) is the sixth leading cause of cancer death in both sexes in 2022, responsible for almost 5% of all cancer deaths worldwide; it is characterized by a poor prognosis since most patients present with an unresectable and metastatic tumor. To date, the decreasing trend in mortality rates related to the most common cancers has contributed to making pancreatic cancer a serious public health problem. In the last few years, scientific research has led to many advances in diagnostic approaches, perioperative management, radiotherapy techniques, and systemic therapies for advanced disease, but only with modest incremental progress in PC patient outcomes. Most of the causes of this high mortality are, unfortunately, late diagnosis and an important therapeutic resistance; for this reason, the most recent high-throughput proteomics technologies focus on the identification of novel biomarkers and molecular profiling to generate new insights in the study of PC, to improve diagnosis and prognosis and to monitor the therapies progress. In this work, we present and discuss the integration of results from different revised studies on protein biomarkers in a global proteomic meta-analysis to understand which path to pursue scientific research. In particular, cancer signaling, inflammatory response, and cell migration and signaling have emerged as the main pathways described in PC, as well as scavenging of free radicals and metabolic alteration concurrently highlighted new research insights on this disease. Interestingly, from the study of upstream regulators, some were found to be shared by collecting data relating to both biological fluid and tissue biomarkers, side by side: specifically, TNF, LPS, p38-MAPK, AGT, miR-323-5p, and miR-34a-5p. By integrating many biological components with their interactions and environmental relationships, it's possible to achieve an in-depth description of the pathological condition in PC and define correlations between concomitant symptoms and tumor genesis and progression. In conclusion, our work may represent a strategy to combine the results from different studies on various biological samples in a more comprehensive way.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.