ReviewCirculation. Cardiovascular imaging2025
Imaging of the Acute and Chronic Cardiovascular Complications of Radiation Therapy.
Review in Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer Therapy: Potential Mechanisms of Ferroptosis and Treatment Strategies.Cells · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Imaging for the Early Detection of Cardiotoxicity from Emerging Cancer Therapies: Mechanistic Insights Across the Pediatric and Adult Spectrum.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Understanding the Mechanisms of Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Events in Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Application value of image-guided radiotherapy in reducing setup errors of head and neck tumors: a retrospective study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Cardiotoxicity Induced by Anticancer Therapies: A Call for Integrated Cardio-Oncology Practice.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Narrative Literature Review of Cancer Therapy-related Cardiac Dysfunction.Journal of medical ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chest radiotherapy (XRT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of a multitude of cancers including breast, lung, esophageal, and lymphoma. Although XRT enhances cancer survival rates, it may also expose healthy bystander tissues to radiation, potentially leading to severe complications. Initially considered relatively resistant to radiation damage, the heart has been shown over the past 4 decades to be susceptible to radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity and despite advances in XRT which can minimize radiation exposure to heart tissue, no cardiac radiation dose is entirely safe. The clinical spectrum of radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity is broad, encompassing coronary artery disease, myocardial dysfunction, valvular abnormalities, and pericardial disorders. Radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity may manifest acutely or many years after XRT, with each condition more likely to present at certain time points post-XRT. Cardiac imaging is a crucial tool in both the screening and diagnosis of radiation-induced cardiovascular toxicity with an understanding of its pathophysiology, incidence, and progression required to implement a comprehensive, multimodality imaging approach to detect and manage these complications effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.