Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39957758›Full record

ReviewPain reports2025

Efficacy of mobile health interventions in the conservative management of chronic low back pain in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis.

Babina Rani, Mayank Gupta, Venkata Ganesh, Rajni Sharma, Anuj Bhatia, Babita Ghai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Babina RaniDepartment of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-5187
Mayank GuptaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bathinda, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-2997
Venkata GaneshDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-5198
Rajni SharmaDepartment of Paediatrics, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0799-1914
Anuj BhatiaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6292-8654
Babita GhaiDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1885-332X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major global health issue, particularly severe in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where health care resources and accessibility are limited. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer a promising solution by leveraging technology to deliver health care services remotely. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mHealth interventions in managing CLBP in LMICs. A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed for studies published until June 2024, evaluating mHealth interventions for CLBP in LMICs. Primary outcomes measured were pain intensity and disability, while secondary outcomes included quality of life (QoL). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB2), and quality of evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Robustness of meta-analysis results was assessed via trial sequential analysis (TSA). Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. The mHealth interventions significantly reduced the overall pain intensity (MD = -1.11, 95% CI: -1.75, -0.46) and disability (MD = -6.59, 95% CI: -10.65, -2.54). Subgroup analysis indicated greater effectiveness of short-term interventions (<6 weeks) in reducing pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) vs long-term interventions (>6 weeks). mHealth interventions notably reduced pain and ODI scores vs unsupervised programs but showed no significant difference compared to in-person programs. The z-score line remained within TSA boundaries. mHealth interventions show potential in reducing pain and disability among patients with CLBP in LMICs, although with inconclusive impact on QoL. The high heterogeneity and limited number of studies underscore the need for further research with greater sample size to validate these findings and explore the long-term benefits and implementation challenges of mHealth in resource-constrained settings.

Indexed as

Chronic low back painLow- and middle-income countriesmHealthMobile health

Identifiers

PMID39957758
PMCPMC11826050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.