ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
The clinical significance of T cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression in central nervous system germ cell tumors.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive characterization and prognostic analysis of multifocal intracranial germ cell tumors.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics exploration of CAV1Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable machine learning model predicts response to adjuvant therapy after radical cystectomy in bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Primary central nervous system germ cell tumors (CNS GCTs) are rare intracranial malignancies, and their tumor microenvironment plays a crucial role in tumor initiation and progression. However, the specific characteristics of the immune microenvironment and their clinical significance remain poorly understood. Methods: This study included 93 paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 90 patients diagnosed with CNS GCTs. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining were used to assess the infiltration patterns of T cell subsets (CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, Foxp3+) and the expression levels of immune checkpoints (CTLA-4, PD-1, PD-L1). Additionally, the study explored the relationship between these immune features and the patient's clinical characteristics and prognosis. Results: The study revealed that germinomas exhibited significantly higher infiltration of CD4+ and Foxp3+ T cells compared to non-germinomatous GCTs (NGGCTs). Additionally, CTLA-4 expression was detected in 58.06% of cases, while PD-1 and PD-L1 were expressed in over 90%, with higher CTLA-4 levels in germinomas and elevated PD-L1 levels in NGGCTs. T cell infiltration was positively correlated with immune checkpoint expression, particularly in germinomas. The results also highlighted the strong immunosuppressive nature of the CNS GCTs' tumor microenvironment. Furthermore, T cell infiltration and immune checkpoint expression were closely associated with clinical characteristics and prognosis. Notably, PD-1 expression was identified as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Conclusion: Our study highlighted the distinct characteristics of T cell infiltration and the significant expression of immune checkpoints in CNS GCTs, revealing the highly heterogeneous and immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment. PD-1 expression was identified as an independent prognostic predictor, offering a foundation for enhancing risk stratification in CNS GCT patients. These findings also support the potential for future clinical applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 monoclonal antibodies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.