ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Comparison of macular retinal thickness measurements using spectral-domain and swept-source optical coherence tomography in healthy eyes.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of 0.01% Atropine on Choroidal Thickness and Ocular Growth in Pre-myopic Children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Trial
- Macular Layer Thickness with Spectral-Domain and High-Resolution OCT.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Peripheral instability gradient in macular thickness measurements across five optical coherence tomography systems: a prospective cross-sectional study of inter-device agreement and clinical monitoring risk.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning strategies for estimating retinal thickness from fundus images: a comparative study with multi-device data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Brain and retina in Alzheimer's disease: Pathological intersections and estimates from imaging.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
- Discriminative Abilities of Macular and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Multiple Sclerosis and Optic Neuritis.Journal of current ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study compares retinal thickness measurements in healthy eyes using one SD-OCT and two SS-OCT devices to assess differences and consistency for clinical application. Methods: Forty-eight eyes with a mean age of 28.15 ± 8.85 years were enrolled. Retinal thickness was measured using Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT, Svision VG200 SS-OCT, and TowardPi En Face SS-OCT. Normally distributed data were presented as mean ± SD; non-normal data as median (P25-P75). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess agreement, with a 7 μm error threshold. Results: Significant differences were found between the three devices ( Conclusion: The measurements of macular retinal thickness using SD-OCT and SS-OCT devices showed poor consistency and cannot be used interchangeably. However, measurements obtained from different SS-OCT devices demonstrated good consistency. To enhance the accuracy of results, it is recommended to maintain consistency in the devices used for follow-up examinations in the same patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.