Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959282›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of diabetes2025

Improving nursing care protocols for diabetic patients through a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent years.

Mónica Grande-Alonso, María Barbado García, Soledad Cristóbal-Aguado, Soledad Aguado-Henche, Rafael Moreno-Gómez-Toledano

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of diabetes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mónica Grande-AlonsoUniversidad de Alcalá, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Spain.
María Barbado GarcíaUniversidad de Alcalá, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Spain.
Soledad Cristóbal-AguadoUniversidad de Alcalá, Department of Nursery, Alcala de Henares 28871, Madrid, Spain.
Soledad Aguado-HencheUniversidad de Alcalá, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Spain.
Rafael Moreno-Gómez-ToledanoUniversidad de Alcalá, Department of Surgery, Medical and Social Sciences, Area of Human Anatomy and Embryology, Alcalá de Henares 28871, Spain. rafael.moreno@uah.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus has become one of the major pandemics of the 21

aimTo analyse nursing interventions in recent years through a systematic review and meta-analysis and to propose improvements in care plans.

methodsThis study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of nursing interventions on quantitative glycaemic variables, such as glycated haemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose.

resultsAfter confirming that the combined effect of all studies from the past 5 years positively impacts quantitative variables, a descriptive analysis of the studies with the most significant changes was conducted. Based on this, an improvement in diabetic patient care protocols has been proposed through follow-up plans tailored to the patient's technological skills.

conclusionThe combined results obtained and the proposal for improvement developed in this manuscript could help to improve the quality of life of many people around the world.

Indexed as

Diabetes mellitusMeta-analysisNursing interventionsProtocol enhancement proposalSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39959282
PMCPMC11718483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.