Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959289›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Quantitative, Dynamic Detection of Neuronal Na

Sara Eitelmann, Karl W Kafitz, Christine R Rose, Jan Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sara EitelmannInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Karl W KafitzInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christine R RoseInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jan MeyerInstitute of Neurobiology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) is a highly valuable technique in the fluorescence microscopy toolbox because it is essentially independent of indicator concentrations. Conventional fluorescence microscopy analyzes changes in emission intensity. In contrast, FLIM assesses the fluorescence lifetime, which is defined as the time a fluorophore remains in an excited state before emitting a photon. This principle is advantageous in experiments where fluorophore concentrations are expected to change, e.g., due to changes in cell volume. FLIM, however, requires collecting a substantial number of photons to accurately fit distribution plots, which constrains its ability for dynamic imaging. This limitation has recently been overcome by rapidFLIM, which utilizes ultra-low dead-time photodetectors in conjunction with sophisticated rapid electronics. The resulting reduction in dead-time to the picosecond range greatly enhances the potential for achieving high spatio-temporal resolution. Here, we demonstrate the use of multi-photon-based rapidFLIM with the sodium indicator ION NaTRIUM Green-2 (ING-2) for the quantitative, dynamic determination of Na

Indexed as

Chemical ischemiaFluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM)HippocampusING-2Multi-photon imagingNeuronSodium

Identifiers

PMID39959289
PMCPMC11825299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.