ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
The growth diversity of preterm infants at 0-36 months corrected age in China: a real-world observational study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Premature delivery interrupts the natural growth of the fetus. The postnatal healthy management of preterm infants still follows term standards after a postmenstrual age (PMA) of 40 weeks and there is a lack of research on the longitudinal dynamic postnatal growth tracks of preterm infants. Methods: Based on the database established by the Wuhan University Internet+ Early Childhood Development Alliance in China, information on preterm infants, including birth registration and health follow-ups from 2016 to 2022, was incorporated into the health management system. Standardized anthropometric measurements of preterm infants were recorded from birth to a corrected age (CA) of 36 months. A generalized additive model based on location, scale, and shape was used to establish the percentile values and growth curves. Results: In total, 79,514 preterm infants were included in this study, and the birth weights at each gestational age (GA) were similar to Chinese standards. When evaluated by term birth weight, we found that the proportions of extrauterine growth retardation at a PMA of 40 weeks were all above 10% in the GA ≤34-week groups and reached between 17.19% and 55.56% in very preterm infants (VPIs). There was a high incidence of preterm infants with a weight below the third percentile in VPIs when referring to term standards at CAs of 0, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months ( Conclusion: Our study revealed the different growth trajectories of preterm infants with different GAs. A set of growth curves and percentile values for preterm infants of different GAs between CAs of 0 and 36 months were established, offering an optional method for growth assessment of this special population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.