Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39959564›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2025

The Value of Non-Instrumental Information in Anxiety: Insights from a Resource-Rational Model of Planning.

Bilal A Bari, Samuel J Gershman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bilal A BariDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8381-3802
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6546-3298

Funding

Fostering Research Mentorship & Training during Psychiatry Residency SupplementR25MH094612 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FAVA, MAURIZIO, GREENFIELD, SHELLY F. · 2011 to 2022
$2.3M
Fostering Research Mentorship and Training During Psychiatry ResidencyR25MH135837 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MAURIZIO FAVA, ISABEL TERESA LAGOMASINO · 2024 to 2026
$648k
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH094612NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH135837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety is intimately related to the desire for information and, under some accounts, thought to arise from the intolerance of uncertainty. Here, we seek to test this hypothesis by studying the relationship between trait anxiety and the willingness to pay for non-instrumental information (i.e., information that reveals whether an event will happen but cannot be used to change the outcome). We model behavior with a resource-rational model of planning, according to which non-instrumental information is useful for planning ahead, but paying for this information only makes sense if the anticipated benefits of planning outweigh the cognitive and financial costs. We find a bidirectional effect of trait anxiety factors on information seeking behavior: those with high trait somatic anxiety exhibit a stronger preference for non-instrumental information, whereas those with high trait negative affect exhibit a weaker preference. By fitting the resource-rational model, we find that this divergent desire for information arises from the utility of obtaining information for future planning (increased in somatic anxiety, decreased in negative affect). Our findings lend support to the intolerance of uncertainty hypothesis in somatic anxiety and highlight the importance of studying anxiety as a multifactorial construct.

Indexed as

anxietydecision makingresource rationalityuncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39959564
PMCPMC11827562

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.