ArticleJournal of inflammation research2025
Prognostic Value of Inflammatory and Nutritional Indicators in Non-Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative HALP Score as a Marker of Tumor Aggressiveness and Survival in Surgically Treated Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- The association of the systemic inflammation response index with the prognosis of primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma after surgical resection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has lacked reliable prognostic indicators. This study evaluates blood-based inflammatory and nutritional indexes to identify good predictors for STS outcomes. These indicators included neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (PNI), albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR), and platelet-to-albumin ratio (PAR). Methods: A total of 93 were included, and blood indexes were measured preoperatively. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses identified significant predictors, and model performance was assessed using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Concordance Index (C-index), and Likelihood Ratio Chi-Square (LR_χ2). Results: Univariate analysis indicated that NLR, PLR, LMR, SIRI, AGR, and PAR show potentially significant differences ( Conclusion: Preoperative SIRI is a better predictive index compared to NLR, PLR, and LMR. Preoperative SIRI and AGR are independent risk factors for both DFS and OS. The combination index of the SIRI+AGR+Enneking stage provides a more robust prediction of clinical prognosis in STS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.