ReviewCEN case reports2025
Two adolescents with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome newly diagnosed after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: case report and literature review.
Review in CEN case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though several cases of new-onset nephrotic syndrome following vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have been reported, none have included the medium- to long-term prognosis of the patients. Here, we report the prognoses of two adolescents, aged 14 and 15 years, who developed nephrotic syndrome soon after receiving the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Both patients were diagnosed with nephrotic syndrome after developing edema within a few days post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Although they achieved rapid and complete remission with prednisolone therapy, they developed frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome and were initiated on cyclosporine. In one patient, frequent relapses occurred while taking cyclosporine, requiring rituximab to maintain remission. Measurements of antibody titers against the spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine taken over time revealed significantly lower titers in both patients compared with those in healthy individuals. Furthermore, each patient was infected with SARS-CoV-2 about 12 months post vaccination, with mild symptoms. Nephrotic syndrome did not recur in either patient. We also reviewed 49 published cases of patients who developed nephrotic syndrome after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, compared to our pediatric cases, there are no cases of recurrence with the same frequency in adult cases, and it is desirable to accumulate and compare more pediatric cases in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.