ArticleInflammatory bowel diseases2025
S1P Lyase Inhibition Increased Intestinal S1P, Disrupted the Intestinal Barrier and Aggravated DSS-Induced Colitis.
Article in Inflammatory bowel diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redirection of sphingolipid metabolism drives cytoskeletal defects in SPLIS and reveals ROCK inhibition as therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSphingosine-1-phospate (S1P) receptor agonists (eg, ozanimod) desensitize migrating lymphocytes by irreversibly binding to S1P receptors (S1PR) and triggering their proteasomal degradation. Desensitized lymphocytes cannot sense S1P, therefore, halting lymphocyte recirculation. The S1P lyase (SPL) irreversibly degrades S1P and its inhibition disrupts the S1P gradient. We previously found that systemic SPL inhibitors induce central immunosuppression. Here, we examined whether SPL inhibition may attenuate colitis without systemic immunotoxicity.
methodsWe first analyzed SPL expression and localization in mice using qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. SPL inhibitors 4-deoxypyridoxine hydrochloride (DOP) and 2-acetyl-4-(tetrahydroxybutyl) imidazole (THI) were used to inhibit SPL systemically, whereas a conditional intestinal epithelial cell (IEC)-specific SPL-deficient mouse was used to evaluate the effects of IEC-specific SPL inhibition on survival, disease activity, histological severity of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis, S1P levels, and intestinal permeability.
resultsSgpl1 mRNA transcripts and protein were ubiquitously expressed in gastrointestinal (GI) tract leukocytes and IEC. Systemic SPL inhibitors did not induce colitis by themselves but depleted CD4+ and CD8+ T cells from blood. However, contrary to its therapeutic effects on ileitis, systemic inhibition reduced survival, accelerated weight loss, worsened histopathological inflammation indices, and tissue damage. We then examined the effects of IEC-specific inhibition on peripheral cell counts and severity of colitis. We found that while it spared peripheral immunity, it similarly hastened colitis. Finally, we examined whether colitis acceleration was due to epithelial barrier compromise after disruption of the S1P gradient. We found that not only systemic but also IEC-specific SPL inhibition increased local S1P levels and led to IEC barrier compromise.
conclusionHomeostatic intestinal S1P levels are critical for the regulation of IEC barrier function. Further studies using adaptive immunity-based inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) models are required to assess the translational value of IEC-specific SPL inhibition as a therapeutic target for human IBD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.