ArticleMedicine2025
Gut-disc axis: A Mendelian randomization study on the relationship between gut microbiota and cervical spondylosis.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Gut-Disc Axis: Mendelian Randomization Study Reveals Causal Effects of Gut Microbiota on Intervertebral Disc Degeneration Not Mediated by Systemic Inflammation.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The gut-disc axis, which refers to the interaction between gut microbiota and bone health, has recently garnered widespread attention in the scientific community. However, it remains to be determined whether gut microbiota directly induces cervical spondylosis (CS). This study employed a bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the potential causal link between gut microbiota and CS. We initially used the inverse variance weighted method for preliminary estimation and supplemented it with other MR methods, including MR-Egger, weighted median, weighted mode, and simple mode. Furthermore, we utilized the Cochrane Q test, MR-PRESSO global test, and MR-Egger intercept test to assess possible pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Ultimately, we conducted a bidirectional MR study to investigate potential reverse associations between gut microbiota and CS. The preliminary MR analysis identified 27 gut microbiota significantly associated with CS, of which 12 may be contributing factors, while 15 may have protective effects. The reverse MR analysis further revealed a potential causal relationship between CS and 24 gut microbiota. In this study, no significant heterogeneity or pleiotropy was detected. Through MR analysis, we uncovered a significant causal relationship between gut microbiota and CS, providing new perspectives for the prevention and treatment of CS, especially in the modulation of the microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.