ReviewCirculation2025
Sex Chromosomes and Sex Hormones: Dissecting the Forces That Differentiate Female and Male Hearts.
Review in Circulation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- SREBP1 Transactivation of NHE3 Impairs Cardiac Contraction and Aggravates Heart Failure.Circulation · 2026Article
- Menopause Hormone Therapy After Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Gap in the Literature.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Sex and ovarian hormone status shape baseline cardiovascular physiology in Sprague Dawley rats.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Novel model to predict survival in DCD heart transplants: Development of a mortality risk score using UNOS data.JHLT open · 2026Article
- Loss of DNA methyltransferase 3a enhances Caspase-8 transcription and promotes cardiomyocyte pyroptosis during myocardial infarction.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Metabolic Messengers: testosterone.Nature metabolism · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heart is a highly sex-biased organ, as sex shapes innumerable aspects of heart health and disease. Sex chromosomes and sex hormones -testosterone, progesterone, and estrogen- establish and perpetuate the division between male and female myocardium. Of these differentiating factors, the insulating effects of estrogen have been rigorously interrogated and reviewed, whereas the influence of sex chromosomes, testosterone, and progesterone remains in dispute or ill-defined. Here, we synthesize growing evidence that sex chromosomes and sex hormones substantially bias heart form, function, and dysfunction in a context-dependent fashion. The discrete protective functions ascribed to each of the 3 estrogen receptors are also enumerated. Subsequently, we overview obstacles that have historically discouraged the inclusion of female subjects in basic science such as the impact of the female estrus cycle and reproductive senescence on data reliability and reproducibility. Furthermore, we weigh the utility of several common strategies to intercept and rescue sex-specific protection. Last, we warn of common compounds in animal chow and cell culture that interfere with estrogen signaling. In sum, we survey the controversies and challenges that stem from sex-inclusive cardiovascular research, comparing the possible causes of cardiac sex bias, elucidating sex chromosome or hormone-dependent processes in the heart, describing common lapses that imperil female and male cell and animal work, and illuminating facets of the female heart yet unexplored or still uncertain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.