Evidence mapPaperPMID 39961679Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Patient and family engagement interventions for enhancing patient safety in the perioperative journey: a scoping review.

Ayshe Seyfulayeva, Bianca Ferreira Fonte, Ana Margarida Alho, Anum Shaikh, Ana Beatriz Nunes, Pedro Gonçalves Carvalho Casaca, Andreia Leite, Ayda Taha, Neelam Dhingra-Kumar, Paulo Sousa

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ayshe SeyfulayevaNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal ays.seyfulayeva@ensp.unl.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2663-4258
Bianca Ferreira FonteNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Margarida AlhoPublic Health Research Centre, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, REAL, CCAL, NOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Anum ShaikhNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2305-8161
Ana Beatriz NunesNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0368
Pedro Gonçalves Carvalho CasacaNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Andreia LeiteNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ayda TahaPatient Safety and Quality of Care, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Neelam Dhingra-KumarPatient Safety Flagship Unit, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Paulo SousaNOVA University Lisbon National School of Public Health, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9502-6075

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical procedures present intricate challenges within healthcare delivery, often associated with higher risks of adverse events compared with non-surgical contexts. Patient and family engagement (PFE) throughout the perioperative journey is a possibility to enhance care quality, safety and patient-centredness. However, literature addressing PFE across the entirety of the perioperative journey remains sparse.

objectiveThe current scoping review aims to comprehensively map the existing interventions with PFE approach focused on improving patient safety across various types of surgical procedures throughout the perioperative journey. In addition, the review aims to understand the level and type of PFE approach adopted in this context. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles published in indexed peer-reviewed journals from 2003 to 2023, written in English, Portuguese or Spanish, that report on interventions with PFE approach targeting adult surgical patients, their families, caregivers, patient advocates and patient champions. The review includes articles reporting on both inpatient and ambulatory surgical patients.

methodsFollowing Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews framework, this review systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and PsycINFO for relevant articles. Eligible interventions were categorised using PFE framework regarding the level of engagement and mapped according to the WHO Global Patient Safety Action Plan 2021-2030.

resultsOut of 765 records initially identified, 32 met the eligibility criteria for data extraction and analysis, of which 40% originated from the USA, followed by the UK (18%) and Canada (12%). 47% of the interventions targeted 'multiple/all types' of procedures, 19% focused on cardiothoracic surgeries and 9% on gynaecological procedures or organ transplant. The majority of the interventions (88%) focused on PFE at the direct care level, predominantly adopting a consultation-based approach. Furthermore, 81% of eligible interventions emphasised patient information and education, 16% addressed codevelopment of policy and 3% of interventions focused on patient advocacy.

conclusionThe findings show a predominant focus on PFE interventions targeting patient safety at the direct care level, particularly in the provision of patient information and education. However, interventions at organisational and policy-making levels are notably scarce. Further investment is required to promote interventions engaging patients and families at broader organisational and policy-making levels.

Indexed as

FamilyPatient ParticipationPatient SafetyPerioperative CareHumansHealth policyPatient-centred carePatient safetyShared decision making

Identifiers

PMID39961679
PMCPMC11836844

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.