ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2025
Sex-based Differences in Complications Following Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe role that sex plays in the incidence and outcomes of PCI related complications is not well understood. The purpose of this review is to highlight the commonly encountered peri-procedural complications and search for any sex differences in the published literature. RECENT
findingsProcedure related complications and long-term cardiovascular outcomes remain worse in women. The delayed presentation of women with coronary events and delayed referral for an invasive diagnostic angiogram and subsequent revascularization likely contribute to the worse outcomes. Whether the smaller vessel size, residual Syntax Score, and other biological factors impact periprocedural outcomes is controversial and warrants device and procedure specific research to identify sex differences. Modern day percutaneous revascularization has achieved very high acute procedural success rates and low complication rates with the advent of structured training programs, development of appropriate use criteria and refined devices and technologies in the catheterization laboratory. However, both procedure related complications and long-term cardiovascular outcomes remain worse in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39961890What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.