ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting cell properties with AI from 3D imaging flow cytometer data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Single-pixel imaging flow cytometry for biomedical research.Inflammation and regeneration · 2025Review
- Three-dimensional forward-scattering imaging flow cytometry system for single-cell analysis.APL photonics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting the properties of tissues or organisms from the genomics data is widely accepted by the medical community. Here we ask a question: can we predict the properties of each individual cell? Single-cell genomics does not work because the RNA sequencing process destroys the cell, not allowing us to verify our predictions. To test the hypothesis, we investigate the approach of using AI to analyze single-cell images obtained from a 3D imaging flow cytometer. We analyze the cell image at day zero and make the AI-assisted cell property prediction. The prediction is then examined later when the cells continue to live and develop. Our preliminary results are promising, showing 88% accuracy in predicting cells that will have a high protein expression level. The technique can have strong ramifications and impact on preventive medicine, drug development, cell therapy, and fundamental biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.