ArticleScientific reports2025
Risk factor analysis of adjacent vertebral compression fracture following the surgery of percutaneous kyphoplasty in postmenopausal women.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk factors for vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Global Research Trends and Hotspots on Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Compression Fractures: A Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the risk factors for adjacent vertebral compression fracture(AVCF) following the surgery of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in postmenopausal women. Two hundred and ninety-seven postmenopausal female patients had been reviewed, underwent PKP surgery between January 2016 and December 2020, were divided into two groups according to whether or not AVCF. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of the relative risk factors in the identification of AVCF. In this study of 297 postmenopausal women who underwent PKP, 67 developed AVCF during follow-up. There were no significant differences in BMI, surgical method, or cement leakage between the groups. The AVCF group was older, had lower BMD, less bone cement volume per section, higher VHA, and larger VKAC. The non-fracture group had lower postoperative VAS and fewer surgical vertebrae. The model showed good discrimination with age, BMD, postoperative VAS, VHR, and VKAC. ROC analysis indicated that a postoperative with high VHR, high VKAC or VAS score > 2.5 was highly predictive of AVCF in postmenopausal women after PKP. In the context of PKP for OVCF in postmenopausal women, it is crucial to avoid excessive VHR and VKAC. Postoperatively, clinicians should prioritize pain management strategies to ensure optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.