ArticleScientific reports2025
Long term management of intracranial epidermoids balancing extent of resection and functional preservation in a 20 year institutional experience.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic assisted minimally invasive resection of petrous bone epidermoid cyst via a presigmoid burr hole approach: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Primary Intracranial Cholesteatoma Presenting as a Cerebellar Mass Without Otologic Symptoms.Cureus · 2026Article
- A dual-axis cisternal classification for congenital intracranial cystic lesions: implications for surgical strategy and long-term prognosis.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Article
- Fourth Ventricle Epidermoid Cyst: Case Report of Precision Telovelar Microsurgery, Functional Preservation, and Lifelong Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermoid lesions account for 1% of intracranial neoplasms. Surgical management is challenging due to their adhesion to critical neurovascular structures and tendency for recurrence. The current study examines surgical outcomes, extent of resection, and recurrence rates during long-term follow-up. A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated for epidermoid lesions between 2000 and 2021, focusing on clinical and radiological outcome and long-term symptom development. Among 55 patients (56.4% male), the majority harbored lesions in the cerebellopontine angle (75.3%). The mean age at surgery was 41.3 years, with an average follow-up of 82 months. Total removal was achieved in 61% of cases, with 75% of them remaining recurrence-free. In comparison, 35% of near-total removal and 25% of subtotal removal remained recurrence-free. Immediate symptom improvement was similar after total and non-total removal (12.6% vs. 10.5%), but long-term improvement was higher after total removal (43% vs. 27%). Transient cranial nerve deficits occurred in 25% of total and in 32% of non-total removal cases, with similar rates of minor complications. Total removal provided better long-term symptom control and lower recurrence rates without significantly increasing neurological deficits, supporting it as the preferred surgical strategy while maintaining functional preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.