Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962318›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multi-omics analysis identifies novels genes involved in glioma prognosis.

Yingjie Li, Hong Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yingjie LiShanghai Engineering Research Center for Big Data in Pediatric Precision Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Hong SunShanghai Engineering Research Center for Big Data in Pediatric Precision Medicine, Center for Biomedical Informatics, Shanghai Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200062, China. shpolor@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32070661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliomas have highly variable clinical outcomes that are not adequately predicted on the basis of histologic class nor genetic markers. We performed a comprehensive analysis that integrated multi-omics datasets to elucidate factors influencing glioma prognosis. We detected 17 grade-related genes different in expression between LGG and GBM cohorts. By combining multi-layer information including genetic markers, DNA methylation and gene expression, we constructed two gene networks of relations from the grade-related genes. From the networks, we identified 178 prognostic genes whose activity states, in terms of DNA methylation and gene expression level, are relevant to prognostic outcomes of gliomas, with low activity associated with better outcomes. The efficacy of these 178 genes' activity states as prognostic factors beyond genetic markers, i.e. IDH1 or PTEN gene mutations, was validated externally. Among the 178 prognostic genes, we validated roles in gliomas for 121 genes from previous literature, and more importantly, we identified 67 novel candidate genes for glioma research. Expression of these 178 genes was particularly pronounced during fetal development in various brain regions. Our findings provide clues for understanding glioma prognosis and highlight some novel glioma-associated genes that warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsGliomaDNA MethylationGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksGenomicsHumansMultiomicsMutationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorGliomaMulti-omics analysisPrognostic factorSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID39962318
PMCPMC11833133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.