Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39962366›Full record

Trial reportThe journal of headache and pain2025

Safety and feasibility of deep brain stimulation of the anterior cingulate and thalamus in chronic refractory neuropathic pain: a pilot and randomized study.

Denys Fontaine, Aurélie Leplus, Anne Donnet, Nelly Darmon, Anne Balossier, Bruno Giordana, Benoit Simonet, Petru Isan, Jean Regis, Michel Lanteri-Minet

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journal of headache and pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03399942 (Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain by Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulum and Sensory Thalamus), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03399942 nacompletednot on this map

Treatment of Chronic Refractory Pain by Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Cingulum and Sensory Thalamus: a Feasibility and Safety Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceRan2018 to 2024Enrolled8ConditionsChronic Refractory Neuropathic PainArmsDeep brain Stimulation of cingulum anterior
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Denys FontaineDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France. fontaine.d@chu-nice.fr.
Aurélie LeplusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Anne DonnetFHU INOVPAIN, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Nelly DarmonUniversité Côte d'Azur, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Anne BalossierINSERM (INS) UMR1106, Department of Functional Neurosurgery & Radiosurgery, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Bruno GiordanaUniversité Côte d'Azur, UR2CA, Nice, France.
Benoit SimonetDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Petru IsanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU de Nice, Nice, France.
Jean RegisINSERM (INS) UMR1106, Department of Functional Neurosurgery & Radiosurgery, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Michel Lanteri-MinetUniversité Côte d'Azur, UR2CA, Nice, France.

Funding

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice 16-AOIP-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep Brain Stimulation (DBS) of the anterior cingulum has been recently proposed to treat refractory chronic pain but its safety and its efficacy have not been evaluated in controlled conditions. Our objective was to evaluate the respective feasibility and safety of sensory thalamus (Thal-DBS) combined with anterior cingulate (ACC-DBS) DBS in patients suffering from chronic neuropathic pain.

methodsWe conducted a bicentric study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942) in patients suffering from medically-refractory chronic unilateral neuropathic pain surgically implanted with both unilateral Thal-DBS and bilateral ACC-DBS, to evaluate successively: Thal-DBS only; combined Thal-DBS and ACC-DBS; ACC-DBS "on" and "off" stimulation periods in randomized cross-over double-blinded conditions; and a 1-year open phase. Safety and efficacy were evaluated by repeated neurological examination, psychiatric assessment, comprehensive assessment of cognitive and affective functioning. Changes on pain intensity (Visual Analogic Scale) and quality of life (EQ-5D scale) were used to evaluate DBS efficacy.

resultsAll the patients (2 women, 6 men, mean age 52,1) completed the study. Adverse events were: epileptic seizure (2), transient motor or attention (2), persistent gait disturbances (1), sleep disturbances (1). No patient displayed significant cognitive or affective change. Compared to baseline, the quality of life (EQ-5D utility score) was significantly improved during the ACC-DBS "On" stimulation period (p = 0,039) and at the end of the study (p = 0,034).

conclusionThis pilot study confirmed the safety of anterior cingulate DBS alone or in combination with thalamic stimulation and suggested that it might improve quality of life of patients with chronic refractory neuropathic pain.

trial registrationThe study has been registered on 20,180,117 (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03399942).

Indexed as

Chronic PainDeep Brain StimulationGyrus CinguliNeuralgiaThalamusAdultAgedCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsChronic PainCingulate cortexDeep brain stimulationNeuropathic painThalamus

Identifiers

PMID39962366
PMCPMC11834684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.