ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Exploring potential causal relationships between gut microbiota, inflammatory factors, and postpartum depression: a Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal effects of gut microbiota and blood metabolites on subtypes of perinatal depression classified based on depressive symptom trajectories: a mendelian randomization study.Nutrition & metabolism · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of Skin Microbiota in Autoimmune Skin Diseases from a Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Perspective.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Postpartum Pain and Vaginal-Gut Microbiota Interactions: An Integrative Narrative Review with Implications for Maternal Recovery and Pain Modulation.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Causal Links Between Cerebrospinal Fluid Metabolites and Postpartum Depression: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies have suggested a potential correlation between ecological dysregulation of the gut microbiota (GM) and the onset and development of postpartum depression (PPD). In addition, inflammatory factors (IFs) have been reported to play an important role in the development of PPD. However, the causal connections among GM, IFs, and PPD remain to be understood.
objectiveThis study sought to determine if genetically predicted GM and IFs exert a causal effect on PPD and to study whether IFs mediate the causal effect of GM on PPD.
methodsTwo-step and two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses, primarily employing the inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, were conducted to evaluate the causal relationship between GM, IFs, and PPD, and to assess potential mediating effects. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy tests were performed to evaluate the robustness of the findings and the strength of the causal associations.
resultsClass Alphaproteobacteria, genus Family XIII AD3011 group exhibited a positive association with PPD risk; whereas, the family Clostridiales vadin BB60 group, family Veillonellaceae, genus Ruminococcaceae UCG011, and the inflammatory factors C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) and C-C motif chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3) demonstrated negative correlations with PPD risk. IFs did not exhibit a mediating role. No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was observed.
conclusionsOur MR study offered genetic evidence that GM and IFs contribute to the pathogenesis of PPD, with no mediating effect of IFs. This enhances our understanding of PPD's pathological mechanisms and offers new perspectives for developing novel preventative and therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.