SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2025
Development of research on HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder and emerging trends: a visualization analysis via CiteSpace.
Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global scientific trends on neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder in the early twenty-first century: a bibliometric analysis and visualization analysis.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Review
- Integration of Colorimetric Sensing Dyes and Multi-Substrate Arrays for Food Quality and Safety Monitoring: Design, Optimization, and Analysis.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- AI-powered classification and network analysis for knowledge mapping in medicine: a century of neurosyphilis research.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Mapping the intersection of HIV and Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis of emerging research trends.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the combination antiretroviral therapy era, HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) is still widespread among HIV-infected individuals. However, there is no effective treatment for HAND, and the exact pathogenic mechanism of HAND remains unknown. This paper aims to provide a reference for further exploration in the field of HAND research. Methods: We used CiteSpace software to collect 3057 articles related to HAND in the Web of Science Core Collection for comprehensive analysis. Betweenness centrality, count, and burst values were used as indicators in the visualization analysis, aiming to predict future new directions and cutting-edge trends. Results: The last decade has been the peak period of HAND research, with the most prominent contributions by authors, countries, and institutions being Grant, Igor (135), the USA (2211), and the University of California System (758), respectively. The most frequently cited article is "HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the area of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study." The hotspots in this field are "neurocognitive impairment," "central nervous system," "cerebrospinal fluid," "HIV-1 tat," "SIV," "inflammation," "infection," and "pathogenesis." The current research direction of HAND is focused on exploring the pathogenic mechanism underlying HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment and potential therapeutic targets. Conclusion: This study provides a bibliometric visualization of HAND-related literature to gain insight into the development and frontiers of this research field. The study also provides scholars with detailed references and identifies future research directions to better promote the development of this field of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.