ArticleBioImpacts : BI2025
Effect of parenteral L-carnitine in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.
Article in BioImpacts : BI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pro-inflammatory responses have an important role in developing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). L-carnitine (LC) has been known to possess anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, and antiviral effects. So, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of LC in hospitalized patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial was conducted on hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. The patients were randomized (1:1) to receive LC (n = 50) at a dose of 20 mg/kg or matching placebo (n = 51) from normal saline once daily for 14 days or until hospitalization and standard care. The primary outcome was hospital mortality and disease severity according to the World Health Organization's clinical progression scale. We also assessed the free carnitine level at baseline and the end of the study. C-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and improvement of respiratory conditions were chosen as secondary outcomes. Results: From 104 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 101 individuals' data were analyzed. The LC group showed a significant reduction in LDH levels ( Conclusion: The results of the current study did not support the superiority of LC over placebo in improving oxygenation, decreasing mortality, and hospital stay, as well as CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer in moderate to severe COVID-19 patients. Trial Registration: IRCT20170609034406N10; https://en.irct.ir/trial/60306.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.