Trial reportAnnals of palliative medicine2025
The role of community health workers in a collaborative care management intervention for cancer pain management: a feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Annals of palliative medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07745205 (HEALTHS - Holistic Evaluation of Approaches to Long-term Health and Survivorship), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
HEALTHS - Holistic Evaluation of Approaches to Long-term Health and Survivorship (Focus Phytotherapy) A Single-center, Minimal-risk, Two-phase Study Including a Quantitative Observational Survey and an Interventional Mixed-methods Component With Focus Group Sessions.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite the plausible role for community health workers (CHWs) in supporting historically disenfranchised patients experiencing cancer-related pain, few survivorship care models currently include CHWs. The purpose of our study was to learn from existing CHWs regarding the feasibility of working with rural dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients and their cancer care teams; as well as assessing their anticipated barriers and facilitators of delivering a proposed collaborative care pain intervention [Achieving Equity through SocioCulturally-informed, Digitally-Enabled Cancer Pain managemeNT (ASCENT)].
methodsGuided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD) Research Framework, we recruited experienced CHWs to a mixed-methods feasibility study, including survey, interview and/or focus group. The survey assessed CHWs' comfort level with proposed intervention-related tasks (e.g., working with patients diagnosed with cancer). Interviews and focus groups explored potential training needs, as well as perceived intervention implementation barriers and facilitators. We summarized results using descriptive statistics and a rapid qualitative analytic approach.
resultsIn total, 12 CHWs participated. Data included surveys (n=12), interviews (n=8), and a focus group with 4 participants. Overall, participant-CHWs felt confident they could participate in healthcare teams and remotely engage rural-dwelling and/or Hispanic/Latino patients diagnosed with cancer. Implementation barriers and facilitators included: working remotely in an unfamiliar geographic area, resource availability, technology, implementation-specific challenges, and patient level factors (e.g., loss of motivation).
conclusionsParticipant-CHWs viewed serving on a multidisciplinary healthcare team to support Hispanic/Latino and rural-dwelling cancer patients experiencing pain as feasible but identified training and resourcing needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.