ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
NAVIP: Unraveling the influence of neighboring small sequence variants on functional impact prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic characterization of a nematode tolerance locus in sugar beet.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Once a suitable reference sequence has been generated, intra-species variation is often assessed by re-sequencing. Variant calling processes can reveal all differences between strains, accessions, genotypes, or individuals. These variants can be enriched with predictions about their functional implications based on available structural annotations, i.e., gene models. Although these functional impact predictions on a per-variant basis are often accurate, some challenging cases require the simultaneous incorporation of multiple adjacent variants into this prediction process. Examples include neighboring variants which modify each other's functional impact. The Neighborhood-Aware Variant Impact Predictor (NAVIP) considers all variants within a given protein coding sequence when predicting the effect. As a proof of concept, variants between the Arabidopsis thaliana accessions Columbia-0 and Niederzenz-1 were annotated. NAVIP is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/bpucker/NAVIP) and accessible through a web server (https://pbb-tools.de).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.