Observational studyJMIR public health and surveillance2025
Characterizing US Spatial Connectivity and Implications for Geographical Disease Dynamics and Metapopulation Modeling: Longitudinal Observational Study.
Observational study in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing the impact of incorporating spatially aggregated human mobility data into infectious disease models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Mobility data resolution needed to inform predictive models of spatial epidemic spread from mobile phone data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Characterising non-household contact patterns relevant to respiratory transmission in the USA: analysis of a cross-sectional survey.The Lancet. Digital health · 2025Article
- Improving mobility data for infectious disease research.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Resilience of mobility network to dynamic population response across COVID-19 interventions: Evidences from Chile.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Fine-scale spatial and social patterns of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from identical pathogen sequences.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Predictability of human mobility during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Human mobility is expected to be a critical factor in the geographic diffusion of infectious diseases, and this assumption led to the implementation of social distancing policies during the early fight against the COVID-19 emergency in the United States. Yet, because of substantial data gaps in the past, what still eludes our understanding are the following questions: (1) How does mobility contribute to the spread of infection within the United States at local, regional, and national scales? (2) How do seasonality and shifts in behavior affect mobility over time? (3) At what geographic level is mobility homogeneous across the United States? Objective: This study aimed to address the questions that are critical for developing accurate transmission models, predicting the spatial propagation of disease across scales, and understanding the optimal geographical and temporal scale for the implementation of control policies. Methods: We analyzed high-resolution mobility data from mobile app usage from SafeGraph Inc, mapping daily connectivity between the US counties to grasp spatial clustering and temporal stability. Integrating this into a spatially explicit transmission model, we replicated SARS-CoV-2's first wave invasion, assessing mobility's spatiotemporal impact on disease predictions. Results: Analysis from 2019 to 2021 showed that mobility patterns remained stable, except for a decline in April 2020 due to lockdowns, which reduced daily movements from 45 million to approximately 25 million nationwide. Despite this reduction, intercounty connectivity remained seasonally stable, largely unaffected during the early COVID-19 phase, with a median Spearman coefficient of 0.62 (SD 0.01) between daily connectivity and gravity networks., We identified 104 geographic clusters of US counties with strong internal mobility connectivity and weaker links to counties outside these clusters. These clusters were stable over time, largely overlapping state boundaries (normalized mutual information=0.82) and demonstrating high temporal stability (normalized mutual information=0.95). Our findings suggest that intercounty connectivity is relatively static and homogeneous at the substate level. Furthermore, while county-level, daily mobility data best captures disease invasion, static mobility data aggregated to the cluster level also effectively models spatial diffusion. Conclusions: Our work demonstrates that intercounty mobility was negligibly affected outside the lockdown period in April 2020, explaining the broad spatial distribution of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States during the early phase of the pandemic. Such geographically dispersed outbreaks place a significant strain on national public health resources and necessitate complex metapopulation modeling approaches for predicting disease dynamics and control design. We thus inform the design of such metapopulation models to balance high disease predictability with low data requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.