ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Aortic stretch and recoil create wave-pumping effect: the second heart in the systemic circulation.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aortic stretch and recoil create wave-pumping effect: the second heart in the systemic circulation.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wave propagation in the heart tube is key to establishing an early pumping mechanism, as explained by impedance pump theory in zebrafish. Though initially proposed for embryonic blood circulation, the role of impedance-like behaviour in the mature cardiovascular system remains unclear. This study focuses on the understudied physiological mechanism of longitudinal displacement in the adult aorta caused by the long-axis motion of the heart. Using magnetic resonance imaging on 159 individuals, we compared aortic displacement profiles between a control group and those with heart failure, revealing a significant difference in aortic stretch between the two groups. Building on this clinical evidence, we conducted
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.