SynthesisJournal of medical systems2025
Artificial Intelligence (AI) - Powered Documentation Systems in Healthcare: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Controlled Single-Speaker Evaluation of Ambient Voice Technologies' Speech-to-Text Function Using Narrated Surgical Case-Reports.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Ambient Voice Technology in the National Health Service in England: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation in Routine Danish General Practice: Quantitative Pre-Post Study.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Attitudes Toward Large Language Models in Health Care and Preferences for Their Adoption and Oversight Among Health Care Professionals: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and chatbots in general surgery: a survey among surgeons in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- A Conceptual Model for Ambient AI Adoption: Perspectives From Academia and Industry.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- [Artificial intelligence in the preparation of clinical expert opinions : Current evidence, use cases, and limitations in orthopedic assessment].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Accelerating ambient AI scribe enterprise-scale deployment: Cleveland Clinic's novel approach to health system-industry partnership.npj health systems · 2026Review
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to streamline documentation and support patient-centered gynecologic oncology outpatient visits.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Spiritual Care: Modified Delphi Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Shaping the Future of Men's Health: How AI Could Be a Transformative Tool for Better Patient Outcomes and Provider Efficiency.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Schema Enforcement and Structured-Output Stability in Locally Deployed LLMs for Clinical Admission-Note Editing: A Proxy-Based Pre-Deployment Evaluation.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The ethics of listening walls: patient autonomy and consent in the age of ambient clinical AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Clinician Burnout in the United States: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- Article
- Re-Centering Clinical Documentation in the Age of AI Scribes: Four Aims of the Patient Chart Note.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- Tackling Administrative Burden in Graduate Medical Education: Consider AI-Powered Tools.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
- A Generative AI Framework for Pharmacokinetic Clinical Study Report Authoring.Clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- Large language model-based scribing tools for ophthalmology: performance and safety evaluation using simulated clinical encounters.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) driven documentation systems are positioned to enhance documentation efficiency and reduce documentation burden in the healthcare setting. The administrative burden associated with clinical documentation has been identified as a major contributor to health care professional (HCP) burnout. The current systematic review aims to evaluate the efficiency, quality, and stakeholder opinion regarding the use of AI-driven documentation systems. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines a comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. Two independent reviewers applied inclusion and exclusion criteria to identify eligible studies. Details of AI technology, document type, document quality and stakeholder experience were extracted. The review included 11 studies. All included studies utilised Chat generated pretrained transformer (Chat GPT, Open AI, CA, USA) or an ambient AI technology. Both forms of AI demonstrated significant potential to improve documentation efficiency. Despite efficiency gains, the quality of AI-generated documentation varied across studies. The heterogeneity of methods utilised to assess document quality influenced interpretation of results. HCP opinion was generally positive, users highlighted ease of use and reduced task load as primary benefits. However, HCPs also expressed concerns about the reliability and validity of AI-generated documentation. Chat GPT and ambient AI show promise in enhancing the efficiency and quality of clinical documentation. While the efficiency benefits are clear, the challenges associated with accuracy and consistency need to be addressed. HCP experiences indicate a cautious optimism towards AI integration, however reliability will depend on continued refinement and validation of the technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.