Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39966448›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Developing practical machine learning survival models to identify high-risk patients for in-hospital mortality following traumatic brain injury.

Aref Andishgar, Maziyar Rismani, Sina Bazmi, Zahra Mohammadi, Sedighe Hooshmandi, Behnam Kian, Amin Niakan, Reza Taheri, Hosseinali Khalili, Roohallah Alizadehsani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aref Andishgar *Trauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Maziyar Rismani *Trauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sina Bazmi *Trauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-2128-0924
Zahra MohammadiTrauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID 0009-0006-8075-0427
Sedighe HooshmandiMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Behnam KianMedical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Amin NiakanTrauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza TaheriNeurosurgery Department, Shiraz Medical School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. reza.neuro@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2971-3632
Hosseinali KhaliliTrauma Research Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Roohallah AlizadehsaniBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) offers precise predictions and could improve patient care, potentially replacing traditional scoring systems. A retrospective study at Emtiaz Hospital analyzed 3,180 traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Nineteen variables were assessed using ML algorithms to predict outcomes. Data preparation addressed missing values and balancing methods corrected imbalances. Model building involved training-test splits, survival analysis, and ML algorithms like Random Survival Forest (RSF) and Gradient Boosting. Feature importance was examined, with patient risk stratification guiding survival analysis. The best-performing model, RSF with ROS resampling, achieved the highest mean AUC of 0.80, the lowest IBS of 0.11, and IPCW c-index of 0.79, maintaining strong predictive ability over time. Top predictors for in-hospital mortality included age, GCS, pupil condition, PTT, IPH, and Rotterdam score, with high variations in predictive abilities over time. A risk stratification cut-off value of 63.34 separated patients into low and high-risk categories, with Kaplan-Meier curves showing significant survival differences. Our high-performing predictive model, built on first-day features, enables time-dependent risk assessment for tailored interventions and monitoring. Our study highlights the feasibility of AI tools in clinical settings, offering superior predictive accuracy and enhancing patient care for TBI cases.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticHospital MortalityMachine LearningAdultAgedAlgorithmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisBrain injuriesHospital mortalityMachine learningRisk assessmentSurvival analysisTraumatic

Identifiers

PMID39966448
PMCPMC11836111

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.