Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967028›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational science2025

Bridging Gaps in Oncology: Comparative Analysis of Development and Approval Pathways for Anticancer Drugs and Companion Diagnostic in the United States and Japan.

Kaku Saito, Mamoru Narukawa

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kaku SaitoDepartment of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-7181-2506
Mamoru NarukawaDepartment of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0600-9412

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Companion diagnostics (CDxs) are essential in personalized medicine for oncology, where specific genetic mutations drive treatment decisions. Some differences remain in the regulatory frameworks and approval processes for CDx between the United States (U.S.) and Japan. Data were collected from public databases for CDxs and anticancer drugs approved between January 1, 2014, and August 15, 2024, in both countries. The analysis included both initial drug approvals and supplemental approvals to examine the characteristics of approved CDxs and anticancer drugs, identify regional differences, compare development and approval timelines of CDxs and associated anticancer drugs in both countries, and assess the factors influencing approval timelines. CDx approval has increased significantly in both countries since 2014, driven by next-generation sequencing technologies, with 96 anticancer drug indications approved with CDx in the U.S. and 61 in Japan. In the U.S., drug approvals often preceded CDx approvals, influenced by post-marketing commitments (PMCs), whereas Japan tended to approve CDxs and drugs almost simultaneously. The median gap between CDx and drug approvals in the U.S. was 0 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0-391), indicating a broader range and often longer delay compared to 18 days (IQR: -52 to 0) in Japan, with a statistically significant difference between the two countries (p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed orphan drug designation was significantly associated with CDx-related PMC in the U.S. (p = 0.042). These results highlight the need for greater regulatory harmonization between the U.S. and Japan to streamline approval processes and improve patient access to personalized treatments.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsDrug ApprovalMedical OncologyNeoplasmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansJapanPrecision MedicineUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic Agentscompanion diagnosticsoncologypost‐marketing commitmentregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID39967028
PMCPMC11835765

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.