Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39967220›Full record

ArticleJACC. Asia2025

Extended Period Outcomes of Posterior Box Isolation in 4 Randomized Atrial Fibrillation Catheter Ablation Trials.

Sang Jun Lee, Hee Tae Yu, Sung Hwa Choi, Daehoon Kim, Tae-Hoon Kim, Jae-Sun Uhm, Boyoung Joung, Moon-Hyoung Lee, Hui-Nam Pak

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Asia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02138695 recruitingnot on this map

The Evaluation for Prognostic Factors After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2014 to 2029Enrolled3,100ConditionsAtrial Fibrillation
NCT02176616 naunknown statusnot on this map

Evaluation of Proper Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Strategy for the Patients Who Were Changed to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2014 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmslinear ablation, pulmonary vein isolation
NCT02721121 naunknown statusnot on this map

Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Linear Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2016 to 2021Enrolled220ConditionsAtrial FibrillationArmscircumferential pulmonary vein isolation, Linear ablation in addiction to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation
NCT02747498 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Complex Pulmonary Vein Isolation Additional Linear Ablation for Recurred Atrial Fibrillation After Previous Catheter Ablation: Prospective Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2016 to 2020Enrolled120ConditionsRecurred Atrial FibrillationArmsProcedure with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation, Procedure with linear ablation in addiction to pulmonary vein isolation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sang Jun LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hee Tae YuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: heetyu@yuhs.ac.
Sung Hwa ChoiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Daehoon KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Hoon KimDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Sun UhmDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Boyoung JoungDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Moon-Hyoung LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hui-Nam PakDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-based electrical posterior box isolation (POBI) and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) do not improve the rhythmic outcomes of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in previous studies with 12 to 24 months of follow-up.

objectivesThe authors analyzed the long-term rhythm outcomes of our 4 previously conducted randomized controlled trials comparing CPVI alone vs CPVI plus additional POBI using the intention-to-treat principle.

methodsThe authors analyzed 575 AF patients included in our 4 previous randomized controlled trials. We compared clinical recurrence defined as recurrent atrial arrhythmia after the index procedure. In patients who underwent a repeat procedure because of recurrence after the index procedure, the mechanism of recurrence was analyzed.

resultsAfter a median follow-up of 48 months, there were no significant differences in the clinical recurrence or major adverse cardiac events between the CPVI alone and CPVI plus POBI groups. The procedure time was significantly longer, and the atrial tachycardia recurrence rate was higher in the CPVI plus POBI group. In the patients who experienced clinical recurrence, there were no significant differences in the rates of cardioversion or need for repeat procedures between the groups. In patients who underwent a repeat procedure because of recurrence after the index procedure (n = 64), the pulmonary vein reconnection rate did not differ, but re-entrant atrial tachycardia was more common in the CPVI plus POBI group, while extrapulmonary vein triggers were more common in the CPVI alone group.

conclusionsThe addition of POBI to CPVI did not improve the long-term rhythm outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. (The Evaluation for Prognostic Factors After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, NCT02138695; Evaluation of Proper Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Strategy for the Patients Who Were Changed to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, NCT02176616; Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Linear Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial, NCT02721121; Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Complex Pulmonary Vein Isolation Additional Linear Ablation for Recurred Atrial Fibrillation After Previous Catheter Ablation: Prospective Randomized Trial [RILI Trial]; NCT02747498.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationcatheter ablationlong-termposterior box isolationrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39967220
PMCPMC11840270

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.