ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2025
Residential Segregation and Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States, 2010 to 2018.
Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResidential segregation limits the access to resources, primarily because of disinvestment. This study evaluated the association between residential segregation and colorectal cancer screening in the United States and whether findings differed by race and ethnicity.
methodsRestricted National Health Interview Survey data (2010-2018) were used to ascertain colorectal cancer screening adherence per US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Residential segregation was operationalized using the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), based on income, race, and ethnicity information obtained from the 2014 to 2018 American Community Survey estimates for counties. Multivariable logistic regression models with robust variance estimators accounting for within-county correlation were used. Analyses were stratified by race and ethnicity and weighted to represent the US population.
resultsIn this cross-sectional study (n = 44,690), participants residing in less advantaged counties had lower colorectal cancer screening adherence than those residing in the most advantaged counties [Q1 vs. Q5, OR (95% confidence interval): ICE income, 0.77 (0.70-0.86); ICE race, 0.86 (0.77-0.96); ICE race + income, 0.75 (0.67-0.84)]. In analyses stratified by race and ethnicity, we observed that overall findings were mostly driven by White people and estimates were less precise with no clear gradients among racial and ethnic minoritized groups. Among Black participants, colorectal cancer screening did not vary across quintiles of economic segregation.
conclusionsResidential segregation was associated with colorectal cancer screening. IMPACT: Interventions aimed at improving colorectal cancer screening uptake in the United States should address structural barriers present in areas with higher concentrations of low-income minoritized racial and ethnic groups and how features of residential segregation might differentially affect racial and ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.